House Bill 25-1147 Reengrossed

LLS NO. 25-0463.01 Michael Dohr x4347
First Regular Session
Seventy-fifth General Assembly
State of Colorado

House Sponsorship

Mabrey and Velasco, Bacon, Carter, Garcia, Gilchrist, Zokaie, Brown, English, Espenoza, Froelich, Jackson, Lindsay, Sirota, Story

Senate Sponsorship

Amabile and Weissman, Gonzales J., Hinrichsen


This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the House of Introduction

House 3rd Reading Unamended March 7, 2025

House Amended 2nd Reading March 5, 2025


House Committees

Judiciary

Senate Committees

No committees scheduled.


Strikethrough:
removed from existing law
Screen Reader Only:
all text indicated as strikethrough will begin as 'deleted from existing statue' and finish with 'end deletion'
All-caps or Bold and Italic:
added to existing law
Screen Reader Only:
all text indicated as all-caps or bold and italic will begin as 'added to existing law' and finish with 'end insertion'
Underline:
Senate Amendment
Highlight:
House Amendment

A Bill for an Act


Bill Summary

(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

The bill caps the maximum incarceration sentence for a municipal violation that has a comparable state law crime at the same length as the state-level offense. When there is no comparable state-level offense, the maximum period of incarceration is capped at the maximum for a state-level petty offense. Mandatory minimums and increased penalties based on prior convictions are prohibited unless the person is convicted of a municipal offense for which there is a comparable state offense or of an infraction that allows imposition of the same mandatory minimum or increased penalties based on prior convictions. The bill also caps a consecutive municipal sentence at 2 times the highest charge in the case.The bill clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that municipal defense counsel have the same notice, case information, and opportunity to meet with their clients as do state-level defense counsel. Current law prohibits paying indigent municipal defense counsel on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure if the municipality prosecutes domestic violence cases. The bill applies the prohibition to all municipalities.

All municipal court proceedings are required to be open to public observation. Virtual observation is required for all in-custody proceedings, and prompt resolution of municipal cases is required.