A Bill for an Act
Page 1, Line 101Concerning requiring a jury to determine whether a
Page 1, Line 102defendant has prior qualifying convictions.
Bill Summary
(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)
Under existing law, a person convicted of certain prior offenses may be adjudged a habitual criminal and subject to enhanced sentencing. A jury determines whether the defendant committed the substantive offense charged, and the trial judge determines whether the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged. The bill requires a jury to determine whether the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged for the purpose of determining whether the defendant is a habitual criminal.
Page 2, Line 1Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:
Page 2, Line 2SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-1.3-803, amend (1), (4) introductory portion, (4)(b), (5)(b), and (6) as follows:
Page 2, Line 318-1.3-803. Verdict of jury. (1) If the allegation of previous
Page 2, Line 4convictions of other felony offenses is included in an indictment or
Page 2, Line 5information and if a verdict of guilty of the substantive offense with
Page 2, Line 6which the defendant is charged is returned, the court shall conduct a
Page 2, Line 7separate sentencing hearing for a jury to determine whether or not the
Page 2, Line 8defendant has suffered
such the alleged previous felony convictions.Page 2, Line 9
As soon as practicable, the hearing shall be conducted by the judge whoPage 2, Line 10
presided at trial or before whom the guilty plea was entered or aPage 2, Line 11
replacement for said judge in the event he or she dies, resigns, isPage 2, Line 12
incapacitated, or is otherwise disqualified as provided in sectionPage 2, Line 13
16-6-201, C.R.S. The court shall hold the hearing as soon asPage 2, Line 14practicable. If practicable, the hearing must be conducted
Page 2, Line 15before the same jury impaneled to try the substantive offense.
Page 2, Line 16If that jury has been discharged, the court shall impanel a new
Page 2, Line 17jury for the purpose of deciding any outstanding issues
Page 2, Line 18regarding whether the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged.
Page 2, Line 19(4) If the defendant denies that
he or she has they have beenPage 2, Line 20previously convicted as alleged in any count of an information or
Page 2, Line 21indictment,
the trial judge, or a replacement judge as provided inPage 2, Line 22
subsection (1) of this section, a jury shall determine by separate hearingPage 2, Line 23and verdict whether the defendant has been convicted as alleged. The
Page 3, Line 1procedure
in any case in which the defendant does not become a witnessPage 3, Line 2
in his or her own behalf upon the trial of the substantive offense shall be is as follows:Page 3, Line 3(b) If the verdict is that the defendant is guilty of the substantive
Page 3, Line 4offense charged,
the trial judge, or a replacement judge as provided inPage 3, Line 5
subsection (1) of this section, shall proceed to try a jury shall try thePage 3, Line 6issues of whether the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged.
Page 3, Line 7The prosecuting attorney has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant has been previously convicted as alleged.
Page 3, Line 8(5) (b) If, upon the trial of the issues upon the substantive offense
Page 3, Line 9charged,
the defendant testifies in his or her own defense and, afterPage 3, Line 10
having denied the previous conviction under subsection (3) of thisPage 3, Line 11
section, the prosecuting attorney presents rebuttal evidencePage 3, Line 12pursuant to subsection (5)(a) of this section or the defendant
Page 3, Line 13admits that
he or she the defendant has been previously convicted asPage 3, Line 14alleged,
the trial judge, or a replacement judge as provided in subsectionPage 3, Line 15
(1) of this section, shall, in any sentencing hearing, consider anyPage 3, Line 16
admissions of prior convictions elicited from the defendant in connectionPage 3, Line 17
with his or her testimony on the substantive offense only as they affect thePage 3, Line 18
defendant's credibility. In any sentencing hearing, the prosecution shallPage 3, Line 19
be required to meet its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt thePage 3, Line 20
defendant's prior convictions by evidence independent of the defendant'sPage 3, Line 21
testimony the presentation or admission does not relieve thePage 3, Line 22prosecuting attorney of the burden to prove beyond a
Page 3, Line 23reasonable doubt that the defendant has been previously
Page 3, Line 24convicted as alleged at a subsequent sentencing hearing. If the
Page 3, Line 25same jury that heard the defendant's admission to being
Page 4, Line 1previously convicted as alleged during the trial on the
Page 4, Line 2substantive offense is determining whether the defendant was
Page 4, Line 3previously convicted, the court shall instruct the jury that it
Page 4, Line 4may consider the admission only as it affects the defendant's
Page 4, Line 5credibility and that the prosecuting attorney must prove
Page 4, Line 6beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant's prior convictions by evidence independent of the admission.
Page 4, Line 7(6) If the prosecuting attorney does not have any information
Page 4, Line 8indicating that the defendant has been previously convicted of a felony
Page 4, Line 9prior to the time a verdict of guilty is rendered on a felony charge and
ifPage 4, Line 10
thereafter the prosecuting attorney learns of the felony conviction priorPage 4, Line 11to the time that sentence is pronounced by the court,
he or she thePage 4, Line 12prosecuting attorney may file a new information
in which it shall bePage 4, Line 13
alleged that alleges in separate counts that the defendant has beenPage 4, Line 14convicted of the particular offense upon which judgment has not been
Page 4, Line 15entered and that prior thereto at a specified date and place the defendant
Page 4, Line 16has been convicted of a felony warranting application of increased
Page 4, Line 17penalties authorized in this section and sections 18-1.3-801 and
Page 4, Line 1818-1.3-802. The court shall arraign the defendant
shall be arraignedPage 4, Line 19upon the new information, and, if the defendant denies the previous
Page 4, Line 20conviction, the trial judge
or a replacement judge as provided inPage 4, Line 21
subsection (1) of this section, shall impanel a jury to try the issue prior to imposition of sentence.Page 4, Line 22SECTION 2. Applicability. This act applies to sentencing hearings on or after the effective date of this act.
Page 4, Line 23SECTION 3. Safety clause. The general assembly finds,
Page 4, Line 24determines, and declares that this act is necessary for the immediate
Page 5, Line 1preservation of the public peace, health, or safety or for appropriations for
Page 5, Line 2the support and maintenance of the departments of the state and state institutions.