House Bill 25-1275 Reengrossed

LLS NO. 25-0356.01 Conrad Imel x2313
First Regular Session
Seventy-fifth General Assembly
State of Colorado

House Sponsorship

Soper and Zokaie, Bacon, Bird, Boesenecker, Brown, Camacho, Carter, Clifford, Espenoza, Froelich, Garcia, Hamrick, Jackson, Joseph, Lieder, Lindsay, Lindstedt, Lukens, Mabrey, Marshall, McCluskie, Paschal, Ricks, Rutinel, Sirota, Stewart K., Stewart R., Story, Titone, Valdez

Senate Sponsorship

Weissman and Frizell,


This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the House of Introduction

House 3rd Reading Unamended April 16, 2025

House Amended 2nd Reading April 15, 2025


House Committees

Judiciary

Appropriations

Senate Committees

No committees scheduled.


Strikethrough:
removed from existing law
Screen Reader Only:
all text indicated as strikethrough will begin as 'deleted from existing statue' and finish with 'end deletion'
All-caps or Bold and Italic:
added to existing law
Screen Reader Only:
all text indicated as all-caps or bold and italic will begin as 'added to existing law' and finish with 'end insertion'
Underline:
Senate Amendment
Highlight:
House Amendment

A Bill for an Act


Bill Summary

(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted. If this bill passes third reading in the house of introduction, a bill summary that applies to the reengrossed version of this bill will be available at http://leg.colorado.gov.)

The bill defines "knowing misconduct" as a voluntary act or omission or series of acts or omissions consciously performed by a crime laboratory employee (employee) as a result of effort or determination in which the employee is aware that the employee's conduct is improper and deceptive. The bill defines a "significant event" as an act or omission by an employee that is a gross deviation from the standard operation procedures or accreditation requirements of the crime laboratory, or requirements in law that were applicable at the time of the act or omission of the employee, that could substantially negatively affect the integrity of the crime laboratory activities.

The bill requires an employee to report witnessed or discovered knowing misconduct or a significant event (collectively, "wrongful action") to the director of the crime laboratory (director) or to the employee's immediate supervisor, who shall report it to the director. A director who receives a report shall investigate the alleged wrongful action. The bill requires a crime laboratory director to review all records of the crime laboratory to identify wrongful actions committed prior to July 1, 2025, by a current or former crime laboratory employee.

The director shall notify each district attorney who has jurisdiction over a pending case, or a case that resulted in conviction, that the employee worked on about the reported wrongful action and provide the district attorney with access to information about the wrongful action.

Upon receipt of a wrongful action report from a director, a district attorney shall notify the defendant in each case that the employee worked on about the alleged wrongful action. If the case involved a crime listed in the "Victim Rights Act", the district attorney shall also notify the victim about the alleged wrongful action, if the charges have been filed but the trial has not begun.

The bill establishes a defendant's right to counsel in matters involving an employee's wrongful action and a right to investigate the wrongful action, to request discovery related to the wrongful action, and to seek post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. The bill permits a court to enter a protective order related to discovery requests.

The bill establishes a process for a defendant convicted in a case involving an employee's wrongful action to petition for post-conviction relief based on the wrongful action. If the defendant's petition for post-conviction relief asserts facts that, if true, demonstrate that a wrongful action was material to the case, the court shall decide the claim upon the merits after an evidentiary hearing. At the evidentiary hearing, the defendant has the burden to show that the employee committed the wrongful action and that the wrongful action is material to the case. If the defendant meets their burden, the court shall vacate the defendant's conviction and grant a new trial.