Used Craftsman Radial Arm Saw Data

Table For Sewing Machine Amazon Yamada

Carpenters Mallet Dimensions Github,Wood Burning Signature Verification,Pilot Countersink Bit Set - And More

Владелец сайта предпочёл скрыть описание страницы. In this repository All GitHub ↵. Jump to ↵. In this user All GitHub ↵. Jump to ↵. In this repository All GitHub ↵.  MALLET includes sophisticated tools for document classification: efficient routines for converting text to "features", a wide variety of algorithms (including Naïve Bayes, Maximum Entropy, and Decision Trees), and code for evaluating classifier performance using several commonly used metrics. MALLET is a Java-based package for statistical natural language processing, document classification, clustering, topic modeling, information extraction, and other machine learning applications to text. - mimno/Mallet.  Join GitHub today. GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together. Sign up. GitHub is where the world builds software. November 16, at pm. Following that though, the programmers usually do choose the language in carpenters mallet dimensions github experience… maybe not directly, but I doubt a Carpenters mallet dimensions github. Yet these same articles never bother to state what is wrong with this language or what is accelerating the death of this language. Since these are cutoffs from the stock I used to make the mitered carpneters, the height farpenters exactly the same, making clamping a breeze. As the pieces expand at different rates and in different ways, the table could warp or cup. Drawer faces in process. Many of the languages discussed and not discussed are have been dead a while.

A wide variety of luxury houseboat manufacturer options are available to you, such as project solution capability, design The Starlite 55b offers the same great features as the Starlite 55a, with the luxury of a third bedroom in a lower cuddy. The Starlite 55b offers 2 full-size floor level bedrooms, 1 lower cuddy and 2 large, full-size bathrooms.

The dimensions are 15' wide, a 10' front deck, 8'9" aft deck and 36'3" cabin, giving you a 55' boat. Boat ,Houseboat , House boat for sale. North London, London. Luxury Travel's Best Of the all the themed floating hotels known as the "Hollywood Houseboats," the Yellow Submarine has the most psychedelic paint job.

Visio garden shapes download. Harris has distinguished itself as one of the top pontoon boat manufacturers in the world. Different types of optical filters. The 5 Bedroom Houseboat. Tiny Boat. Summersun Houseboats. Our tiny houseboat packs all the amenities and comforts you'd expect from a full size home.

Fx35 radio install. The best of Luxury Retreats is now Airbnb Luxe—offering the world's most extraordinary homes with the highest standard of service. The world's most extraordinary homes A selection of pristine, expertly designed homes with high-end amenities, services, and dedicated trip designers.

Globe swift modifications. Global Boatworks is the leading floating home and houseboat builder in South Florida. We build custom floating homes for delivery anywhere. Transform script variables servicenow. We are more than a houseboat brokerage. We are a full service company, able to fulfill all of your houseboat needs. Contact us for more. Fae and steel. Odor sensor module. The split door allows the homeowner to get a cross breeze going with the top portion open while keeping her puppy safe inside with the bottom part closed.

From artificial lakes in eastern Germany to the riverside of Portland, Oregon, here are 12 cool houseboats Xlr evolution chassis. Famous Houseboat for Sale. Formerly one of two floating chapels in the world. Now a floating church house for sale! Beguiled — Yes, this houseboat is captivating. People stop and point.

They snap pictures and wave. They want to see inside. From your deck, you smile and wave back. They are mesmerized. And yes, other languages have these features too. Granted one cannot survive by Perl alone. Many of the factory test applications I write use Labview. Creating GUIs in Labview is just so easy and beautiful.

Yet when I need to parse test data, Labview calls my Perl routines which parse and return the data to Labview. The savings in time versus doing regular expressions in Labview are significant. I also used PHP for a while but did not see any advantage over Perl. Designing assembly languages to verify chip designs was a piece of cake with Perl. Perl may not be the best choice or the only choice for every domain of problems.

After all, Perl was written using C. As to unreadable, this is all up to the programmer. You can write a long regular expression and put it on one line or neatly place it on 10 lines. For example, I do not like white space indenting that Python uses. Does that make Python a terrible language? Absolutely not. For example, it is not designed as an OO language but adds it on.

So as not to do a disservice to the community of programmers, we need to be writing about the pros and cons of different languages as a function of the domain of application. What aspiring and existing programmers need to know is that they cannot survive in this programming world with expertise in a single language.

Guidance to selecting languages that improve their productivity and ensure their employment is what we should be writing about. Ruby is certainly not dying with many popular widely used projects like Chef using it to script. I also must know half a dozen programmer buddies that work at successful startups that are almost exclusively rails as well.

What was the last time you used Perl? Not to mention the CPAN!!! Like as if they were tarnished by Ebola or something worse! COBOL is not going to go away, and believe it or not — it works and works well. And, I expect my kids will too, should it be their fancy.

PoweBuilder — I mourn its demise to this day. It missed the the Web boat. I must say, this article exhibits many elements of ignorance.

When is a language dead? When nobody is using the language anymore — and nobody is learning the language. The languages in the list are nowhere near that stage. Huge user base in system administration.

Is not going anywhere. Usage may be waning at the moment, but there is no saying if it will gain traction or not — definitely not dead yet. Dropping Visual Basic. NET means dropping the Microsoft Office primary programming language. Mostly because of ignorant self-educated web developers that do not understand any of the security implications of using Flash or the inherent performance problems it poses to many most users. Perl 5 is better than ever, receiving regular releases and continuing to boast the amazing and ever-growing treasure trove of libraries on CPAN.

And an awesome community to boot. Perl 6 has indeed been in development since Ever wished the authors of the language you were working in had spent more time and energy on its design? Thought so. Learn it or plan on not being employed. No language ever really dies completely.

The support for the language may be gone, but the language still exists. Perl, python, many others fall into this group as well. Somewhere these still exist. He is a PhD candidate at a Best Carpenters Mallet Zip top-tier engineering school, and his application is being used by a world famous scientific institute.

Although some younger folk did attend, like the sharp suited c plus older brother. Perl would have like to have been there, but was just too old and slow to make it. It was and still is the best tool for creating a Win32 exe. We are staying on top of the support for 4 platforms with releases twice a year now to add new capabilities, language features, run-time library capabilities and tool chain support for Intel and ARM processors.

Also 11th in Langpop Google Search analysis. So if it would be really dead this it would mean:. Not to get too personal but you really do not know what you are talking about. While Delphi is not as strong as it was back in the 90s, Embarcadero fully supports it as well as tons of developers using the product or the free pascal compiler Lazarus. If you want to inform people tell them to learn Java since it is being used on the Android platform but who knows what will happen in 10 years from now, certainly not Mr.

Gogswell for sure. There is really not much difference between VB and C. The calls to. Net assembly methods and properties are identical. Just compare any identical code in VB and C and it is easy to see which one is the most readable and easy to understand. Making code easier to read and understand is a GOOD thing, not something to be despised. There are very few things that can be done with C and cannot be done with VB. I have written over applications in VB and never needed those few things it cannot do.

If anything, C should die and be replaced by VB as the standard. Net language. As you say, the calls to the. NET 4. However, their feature lists are otherwise almost identical, and in the long run the popular features always get ported to the other side. This article is definitely too subjective. No legit arguments.

No explanations at all. The article is really about the arc of popularity or adoption. For example, Delphi enthusiasts exist, but the rate at which new programmers adopt it is lower than it was in the s and is much lower than, say, JavaScript or Java.

Based on your examples, Ruby seems not so challenging, especially if you grew up with C-style languages. Judging Ruby and the Rails framework based on one use case 3 years ago is like judging smartphone viability by using a Palm Treo as a benchmark.

Ruby is still the 2 language in Github after Javascript. So Ruby and those others are hardly dying. Of course being that the purpose of this article was to generate clicks, I think the article was a success. In terms of quantifiable facts, not so much. This Ruby is dying meme started about a year ago.. In the case of any. NET language, does it really matter?

They are all is compiled to the. NET framework. I doubt anyone will read this far in the comments, but everyone is arguing that this language or that language is not dead. It sounds like everyone missed the point. The article is about languages marked for death. To the voices that have indicated that people missed the point I know that the these languages are in demanding need but really what is?

A recent survey had Javascript a scripting language nothing more as the top programming language, how can you trust a survey like that? Colleges at the moment are pushing Java since it is free and simple to learn where Pascal was their choice back in the 90s. What Cogswell did with this article was to make it seem like he knows what he is speaking about when he is nothing but a headhunter for an employment firm. The last two commentators think that the Delphi or VB.

NET communities are telling newbies what to do but that is false. What I as well as David I. You have a major group of Pascal programmers in Europe that are pushing Lazarus which is a clone of Delphi 7.

I can go on and on but nobody is telling someone to learn a particular language unless it is beneficial to the person especially a college student. The current job market is Java and the students coming out from school will be looking to work in that field with that language.

A developer like myself, have to learn multiple different languages so that I can market myself anywhere. Even if it is VBA, yes that little visual basic component that is part of the office package and Microsoft Access.

So if you get the message there is no such thing as a dead language and there is no professional software group claiming it. Java and C seem to be the dominant enterprise languages. Of course Javascript is a must for any web developer, as well as a good web framework. When I got out of school 5 or so years ago I chose C because jobs seemed to pay more, and I preferred working with the. Net framework.

Who knows if any language we are using these days will be in use in 30 years, or if they are what they will look like. Any good developer will have a few languages in their arsenal, and the more different kinds languages you know, the easier it is to pick up new languages.

I sense a lot of pain and denial in these comments. A language is not gone just because it is dead. The operative word here would be viable able to live, be alive, survive, not going to die. These languages are either viable or not viable.

The definitions of alive, dead or dying will always be arguable. Cobol is dead like Sumerian. The same is probably true of fortran which was my first language. The question is whether ther are new speakers most of all, not the existence of artifacts.

My take is there are far too many languages being used and new ones in the wings with dubious reasons for being. Being academically or conceptually interesting is important to computer science research but irrelevant to whether it should be used to implement a production system. I strongly feel that python was never needed.

I offered nothing new of significance. That makes it ideal for casual programming by individuals who divide their time among many aspects of their field, only part of which may be programming. The time spent adding functions for specific application domains might have been better spent adding the same functions to a pre-existing equally powerful and broader based language. Many of the languages discussed and not discussed are have been dead a while.

And it would behoove us not to encourage newbies to live with our dead. I think I see your point. Viable speaks to the language being widely chosen for new projects. I think I like that, but disagree that the authors list is accurate even for that definition.

Not quite what I meant. Good Lord that would mean I think the software houses with the big projects choosing the languages and the programmers should be the deciders! Talk about the cart leading the ass. Do I wish it were that simple? Following that though, the programmers usually do choose the language in my experience… maybe not directly, but I doubt a C. Net shop is going to decide to pop up a Java or RoR app even if it is a better language for the product, unless C.

Net simply cannot do what they need it to. Of course any good developer can pick up a new language, but there is often a large rampup time in learning new frameworks which usually makes development teams stick with the drill instead of buying, installing and learning a drill press, unless future gains out weight the cost money and time of the new tool.

I did work at one place for a while that had a VB6 app, but the development team was largely C. Net devs. There was one guy maintaining vb6 while most where working to replace and update its functionality in a new system. Nice call Peter. The fact that there are pages and pages of comments refuting everything in this article shows how passionate programmers are about their languages of choice. Sad that I read through all of them because the comments were all pretty interesting and I had assumed that a lot of these languages were marked for death a long time ago.

Somebody should tell that to the hundreds of NYC startups building their platforms on Rails and the thousands of students going through WDI classes in anticipation of joining or creating the next wave of startups. This article has got to be a troll. In particular, the author singles out Perl and Ruby for a punch in the eye. Perl — admittedly it is a last-generation scripting language still missing usable OO and reflection features.

But it is easy to learn and use — and surprisingly powerful and expressive. There is a gigantic enormous body of existing code out there written in it. I assure you most sys admins would sword-fight you out of the building if you tried to uninstall it from their linux boxes. If a language was so bad that it deserved to die, then Sed and Awk would no longer be used.

But unfortunately such code is still alive and still part of projects new and old, living fossils in a world where anything is OK as long as it compiles, runs, and passes its unit tests. Ruby — was Ruby targeted for tarring and feathering because it borrowed heavily from Perl?

It is truly a great scripting language, just as powerful and full-featured as Python. It has a few warts here and there, but nothing terrible. I think it has a long life ahead of it. If you want to pick on a language, how about Python? In the world of Python, one wrong space and your code compilation fails. Ever try to diff a program where only the spacing is different? Tabs use in a mixed developer environment? They are like kryptonite to Python.

Python is a great language but suffers from the eccentricities of its original author Guido. Moo and Moose provide a similar usable OO toolkit. Moose gives relatively comprehensive reflection, and Moo is slightly less comprehensive in exchange for being much faster.

Perl should definitely die. Just please, stop spreading the DailyMail-esque opinion of languages using things that are plain fallacies spread by cultural myths. COBOL will never die. If it aint broke, well… And those bean counters see no ROI for converting that code, but only risk, so it will never die.

Heck, the data typing is so strict that it is hard to shoot yourself in the foot with it. As a tester, I would test your perl routine with fact -1 and write up a bug on the infinite loop.

Five factorial 5! Exactly or off by 1 So should come out with 6 digits if you calculated the factorial value. So, you also have a mathematical bug or a descriptive bug in your routine.

I don't even know what to call the mathematical process you are running. It is impressive that it doesn't have specific numeric types and that number won't overflow and maintain that much precision. Factorial is, in fact, as described in the article. I might add that since. Net 4. BigInteger structure which would allow C to cope with this calculation just the same as the Ruby example above.

You are right, the web is full of references to n! Some time after I was taught about factorial some 50 years ago, the universe has shifted and it is now no longer a sum but a product of descending numbers.

Some processes could improve it to n! However, the complexity increase meant there was only a slight increase in performance instead of being twice as fast. I have never in my life encountered a process that executes the new to me definition of the factorial process. Anyone with the idea that it refers to a sum rather than a product is simply mistaken. No offence intended.

It apparently is very wrong. But a web site says that sorting may use an n! Unless the author was taught n! Can you name any useful thing you can get from using n!? I mean, other than getting a basically meaningless number. I have 10 items, so there are 10!

Anyway, this can be very useful in determining the odds in a lottery. There are 50 balls and you can pick any 6…furthermore, those numbers can be picked in any order for you to be a winner imagine how much harder it would be to win if you had to pick the numbers in the correct order, too.

It sounds to me that the website that claims that some sorting algorithm which exactly? As for their uses: Factorials are used in combinatorics, for example, there are n! Actually, I have used combinatory calculations and a lot of time to figure out how to not use every combination possible and still have the full coverage of possibilities.

In class we were presented with a puzzle problem. A fellow student calculated with the present computers it would take 6 months to calculate a solution. The puzzle numbers presented really should be calculated in 8 minutes because similar numbers are calculated in 2 minutes on my present device. OK, not exactly half the square.

A professor I had senior year of college, ! Anyone who knows how to program in it can go to one of these companies and most likely retire from there before the company abandons COBOL.

Perl before Perl6 is still a cumbersome, but useful, language. Perl6 is very cool for anyone interested in language parsing. In , when I first became aware of this technique at National Semi in Santa Clara I felt that the technique would be a major advantage in developing software and also in modifying code.

C made coding fun! When Java popped up in the era, it seemed the best implementation of OO techniques without the make work struggles to force C to OO.

I wonder if ANY of them were using Pascal by the end of the 80s? Maybe at Borland until they bet the farm on whatever that DB was. The Visual languages were very helpful for allowing the quick development of UIs in coding. Some implementations were good others garbage, but all offered that quick UI advantage. Perl was fun for quick and dirty development. Funny but not a joke. Well, back to sleep.

O and O. At five I decided to walk up to a video store then, still ramping up in number and videos on the shelves to drop off a tape. I was in the middle of the Mathilda overpass of Central Expressway when the quake hit; it almost threw me over the handrail — which would have meant a 40 foot fall onto a median barrier with survival unlikely — but while my head was a couple of feet on the other side of the handrail, my body mass was below the rail and kept me on the walkway.

The quake itself seemed to be moving SE to NW and there was almost no vertical movement to the thrusts, BUT each one was about 12 to 15 inches in length. After about four jolts while still holding onto the rail, I decided to try to walk off the bridge, every third step was extended by that foot or so, making my steps awkward and long, cartoonlike. Two guys in a car stopped on the south facing my direction saw my cartoon strides and started to laugh and point.

It took about a mile of walking before I could estimate the rating of the quake as 7, which was a big quake. Fifteen years later, after spending most of that time in the Midwest, I had just moved back to Sunnyvale and was walking around the area… and as October moved on, I kept wondering about a nagging sense that something was about to merit an anniversary but WHAT.

Just easier to describe maybe. True as that may be, those communities only exist because of businesses extending the dismal life on what results in code semantics and practices strongly deviated from that of C. Trouble with that is, young developers typically learn C-derivative implementations.

C-style semantics and practices won, people, despite your best efforts to get mad about it. All of the languages on this list look strange to young developers. Another reason employees typically employees closing in on retirement like these languages, is job security. They will purposefully write code that is so unreadable, compounded with the alien nature of their obscure language, that they are the only ones who might maintain a given application.

Any young developer forced to reawaken one of these beasts, generally through an internship, is immediately put off by its foreign style and limited, macho, unhelpful community. Said young developer never works for that company again, and will tend to call out the older developers for selfish stagnation. I have witnessed this numerous times. Are these languages going to die?

Not any time soon, but it sure would be nice if they did. Its only application is for amusement and learning how your syntax works, because doing horrible things requires you do know the ins and outs of your syntax on a very deep level.

Because that statement verges on unqualified rhetoric. Its an extraordinary claim IMO, and that means extraordinary evidence. So I suspect those who are Computer science-related majors probably get to see many languages.

As for the rest, few of them are likely to be true professionals. As a correlation, carpenters can either go through proper training and learn about all of the current tools available and how to implement them according to correct housing codes, or non-professional carpenters can pick up a saw and hammer and learn how to build things without proper training. When it comes time to build a house, it will probably not be up to code, not have the best organization, and in general, have many things wrong with it although maybe not if the person is truly trying to be a professional, which I expect to be rare for the self-learned person.

I think the answer to this original message should be: any language that has large amounts of new code being written on a regular basis is not dying although it might be aging like I suspect we see with VB. If they do not evolve, they will fade away into maintenance mode, like we tend to see with languages like COBOL and Flash that are certainly not dead but have seen better days and will likely never recover to that level.

Who knows. I expect to see JavaScript go through a major change in the next few years and eventually have a new set of tools for using the language that will look nothing like what we saw a few years ago. We saw that with Java and it matured into a solid language and I expect to see more web-based languages do the same.

I dont think you have to be tool agnostic to properly learn a software engineering. I graduated from an accelerated program that taught to the language… C and Java. We learned the tool, then built sample projects to demonstrate our knowledge of the tool. I dont think learning with a language is a bad thing, though I agree, just knowing the language is not enough to be successful in this profession.

Learning more languages makes you a better software engineer as you see different approaches to solving a given problem. That said, I dont think the. The approach they took teaches students to learn for them selves so as things evolve in our industry we are able to evolve with them. I hope it will be like assembly code.

A small percentage of the developers employed today actually write raw assembly, but everything compiles down to it in one form or another. I think we have to come back to the purpose of a computer language. It is a tool to instruct the computer to do useful work for us. In the beginning, the tools were few, and most were quite straightforward to learn. Fortran for science and engineering. The computer science universe has expanded many-fold orders of magnitude, and it is not surprising that so-called specialist niche languages are developing large markets onto themselves.

Problem solving complexity has increased along with the power of computers and we rely on sophisticated languages and frameworks to wrap this complexity into usable tools to build useful things. Still, there are many problems that occur on a regular basis that require only simple tools such as bash, perl, or C to solve. All these languages are just tools. As long as a tool is useful in solving problems, it is unlikely to die, especially generalist tools like the ones I just mentioned.

Specialist tools may have a shorter shelf life simply because the world keeps evolving and the environments they were designed for sometimes become obsolete. Learn the foundations of computer science well, and do be good in at least one high-level generalist language e. Beyond that, if you are specializing in a problem solving domain, you will necessarily need to learn the tools of that domain.

No one has the time to learn everything available out there well. Life has always been that way, people specialize in what they are interested in. Software development is no different.

I agree most higher level languages have vast similarities. That said I think it is useful to learn a strongly typed compiled language and a dynamic interpreted language.

The concepts and theory are similar in both, but in practice they are different beasts. Knowing how to use both makes you a better problem solver I think. Similar to knowing different methodologies and patterns. If all you know how to use is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Learning more languages can only make you more profitable. I dont see many if any postings for those with Scala knowledge. Its actually growing in popularity.

And until then they are too expensive to replace. To get the exact order would be 1 in 1. IE my corrected formula. Multiplying that by 6! What I gather from this comment thread is that almost any programming language you can name is still in use somewhere, but programmer civility when talking to other human beings is dead.

Since programming languages are but tools, they comparatively may be better or worse-fitted for various kinds of programming tasks of all sorts. There may be better languages to do a particular kind of programming job now than the 5 mentioned, but all are still all widely in use and all have millions of lines of code out in the wild to maintain and improve for decades to come.

Sure, lots of COBOL code still exists in legacy applications that are too big, expensive and critical to risk rewriting. At best, a new one will arise for each one that retires. In all likelihood, the number will continue to decrease until it hits an absolute floor. Think about VCRs. And no new movies are going to suddenly see release on VHS. Same with floppy drives I think the last company to make diskettes stopped production a few years ago.

Among those with deeperknowledge, C is derided as slow. Certainly it is the wrong choice for any kindof non-Web-front-end code where performance is important. I for one consider C a toy language. All one needs is benchmarks. Slower than what? You build and check the results.

Good enough? Done, otherwise profile the program, find the bottleneck, optimize that section of code and repeat until the software is fast enough.

It costs a lot more to have a developer spend weeks tweaking a program than it does to add another processor, some more memory, etc. Along similar lines, better to have the computer doing something a few minutes longer than for a developer to spend two weeks to make something two minutes faster.

In a famous example on the Joel On Software blog the author demonstrated how it was much cheaper to upgrade his webserver than to pay a developer for weeks of effort to make his website run faster. JIT compiling have advanced greatly. In an in famous example, both C and Java beat natively compiled Delphi in the SciMark benchmark, for instance.

Again, what kind of performance? If C were so unsuited for non-Web code, why is it used so extensively and sucessfully in the enterrpise? I can personally attest that many Wall Street investment firms have ported their legacy Java and Delphi software to C. One would think performance is important there, no? Again, in many instances speed of development counts for much more than computer runtime performance.

Has anyone ever seen the Tiobe index. If you check it out you can see the trend in all programming languages. But [language I do not use] must be dying because I do no tuse it.

I am crying because that is so true. I certainly like how it is written, and object is an object. And yes I ignored casting in C. Delphi is not marked for death, Delphi XE7 is fully multi-platform, on top of that Delphi serves as basis for most other languages. Everything is multi-platform. Delphi is very, very late to that game. C is sugar-coated assembler. C is also a lot faster than Delphi 2x-3x on various benchmarks.

Who in would want to write a desktop app in sugar-coated assembler, if such a claim were true? Now that Delphi is useless as a Rapid Application Development language Ruby and Python own that market the new claim is that Delphi is super-fast low-level. As such it is not touched unless necessary and they fired a lot of their top developers and offshored development to fresh-out-of-school, underpaid Romanians.

As such, Delphi is hardly a C replacement either. It makes the compilation fast, but it also prevents many modern optimizations from being performed, which is a major reason why most compiled or even JIT compiled languages test faster on execution. Discontinuing Delphi somehow makes assembler disappear? LATIN is a dead language. No language will ever die. The comparable versions would be Delphi Professional and Xamarin Business.

At this point in time EMBT should make at least a free Delphi, that does not have multi-platform enabled, just for Win32 apps. They are all nice, and useful for their share of things. But in the end, I found that nothing compares to Delphi when talking about desktop apps and lately the rest of the platforms that they offer , except maybe C and that is mainly because they were created by the same brilliant mind.

Building and deploying a desktop app using the unnecessarily heavy Java is a pain by comparison. C has this painful dependency to. So as far as desktop applications development goes, Delphi still rules.

There is no other RAD, that is so stable and powerful and gives you the deploy-able executable file when clicking the run button. I keep waiting for the Management of whatever company owns Delphi at one moment EMBT today , to start promoting it for real. There are so many models of companies around to learn from, that promote products which are babies compared to Delphi, and still manage to grab a share of the market.

I would settle for Google, Facebook or Oracle to do it. Just any huge company with enough resources and the fresh minds to give Delphi the boost it deserves.

Sorry but Delphi is not dying its simply dead, its too expensive in this day and age. Where most of the major languages and their platforms are free. Because VB. NET is part of the. NET family, its like saying hmmm lets kill off. Whether an mobile OS is dying or not is determined by how fast their product market is vanishing, right?

We need to get this post in perspective. Any code is just a tool for allowing a system to do what it it was designed to do. Then came a vast array of changes, clay tablets, parchment, quill pens, brushes etc. Every one ot these methods of expression is still used today.

Some artistic endeavors leave us scratching our heads, but for some reason we still enjoy looking at it. Just after the last ice age I started to program as a young Navy Ensign. We coded on Punch Cards , every hanging chad would kick out a fatal error. At the end of a run there would be as many error cards as good ones. The methods of coding have changed over time allowing for greater efficency and productivity. The coders have also changed, some better than others.

The point is that the device using the code has no favorite, it just plain runs what it is fed. Every language, not just coding language has been built from the one before it.

There are common identifiable aspects found in every one of them. The same can be said of all of the languages mentioned in the blog, as long as it gets the job done the device will not care in the least.

Your application will run on any browser without cookies with a desktop look and feel. Although I really think Dart a good language but without any databasing support.

Delphi will outlive C ,ASP. Languages go back and forth, take Fortran for instance, somehow it still is alive, as well as COBOL, however, both have been turned into some sort of Frankstein monsters.

Python, Ruby, Perl and other dialects are extremely permissive, at times promoting bad practices, but at other allowing innovative approaches. Have you ever written programs which write and execute part of their own code at run time? This can be done with SQL procedures too. In the end -very possibly-, the problem lies beyond languages, we just have gone too far in trying to emulate models and abstract approaches with our exhausted hardware schemes.

Just pull out a Casio calculator and use that probably easier syntax wise! What ever happened to good old basic Basic? I remember taking a programming class back in the day. And it worked too. Nice Article, Practically makes u to take a decision about your future to be a developer, And the Winner is C.

NET and Java. Survival of the fittest Developer who wants to have a peaceful life should be capable of making decisions for the short life, the developer is gonna live, This article gives u the Judgement to make you Survive. Not sure if it is dying and people are making poor decisions to continue teaching it to a generation who will never use it, or people are just exagerating.

Nah, Perl is still useful, and making new projects with it today especially web apps is a good choice, although maybe not all of the frameworks are currently up-to-date with explosive web development frameworks and techniques examples.

Perl for system administration and heavy text processing and manipulation, and networking? Hell yeah. End of story? Not quite… I moved to a Microsoft stack thinking they would never be stupid enough to abandon their developer community……. Then Microsoft missed the mobile revolution and dumped on their core developers big time while vainly trying to catch up c.

Silverlight and other abandonware ….. Now I have looked around for a new stable tool stack. The fragmentation in the tools market has become much worse than it was and the fashions seem to come and go at ever increasing speed. As a quick fix for a small job I tried Lazarus. I am amazed at how good a product this is.

Because it is open source I am not dependent on the marketing fashions and management whim. I love how this post has lived so long maybe longer than a few computer languages?? Free, thanks to TSmartObj end; System. I think, that anyone can say anything about programming languages. It depends on the knowledge that each one have about a particular one.

In my own experience, working a long time ago with Visual basic 6. NET, I feel very comfortable with those. My work goes to approximately bits of accuracy, including Machine Efficient Polynomial Approximations and it works as expected, with a high degree of efficiency.

So you state that Perl is dying, but I have to disagree…Why is it a favorite among programmers and developers? Because it has the ability to work with so many other languages and it is much easier to learn vs. If not, then provide some key reasons as to why it is dead other than the fact it is because it took so long for Perl to come out. What would be a good replacement for Flash that could resolve the security risks that have plagued Flash in the past?

A very fast, very clear, very simple, very power language. Free Pascal is actually vey much alive. It is one off the best languages out there.

Craftsman 109 Lathe Chuck App
Small Handheld Saw For Wood Queens